Grand Budapest Hotel

Wes Andersonin uusin elokuva on nimeltään Grand Budapest Hotel ja se rantautuu teattereihin 11.4.2014. Kirjoitan kritiikin lähempänä ensi-iltaa, mutta sitä odotellessa listaan tässä joukon linkkejä, joiden lukeminen saattaa valaista elokuvaa. Osittainen spoilerivaroitus herkimmille.

American Cinematographer keskittyy kuviin:

The filmmakers also experimented with front-projecting window backgrounds for shots in the Kunstmuseum and in Madame D.’s suite at the Grand Budapest. Color-reversal slides were made from digital stills and reflected off a polarized mirror positioned 45 degrees to the camera-lens axis. Scotchlite backdrops positioned at 90 degrees to the lens axis reflected the slide image back to the camera. “There was a magical quality to the image that we all loved, but if things weren’t lined up exactly, there was a ghosting effect,” recalls Yeoman. “And the projector didn’t throw out much light, which meant we were shooting at a T2!”

Slate selittää vaihtuvien kuvasuhteiden merkityksen:

These scenes are in the 1:85:1 ratio, which became a standard format for theatrical releases starting in 1953, and so reads easily as “the present” to a moviegoer.

Creative Review’ssä vilkaistaan graafisen suunnittelun merkitystä elokuvalle:

Wes wrote all the newspaper articles himself – not just articles to accompany the main headlines, but the surrounding ones too.

The Dissolvessa tuotantosuunnittelija raottaa hieman verhoa:

In this movie, there’s a Bergman film called The Silence, with the boy wandering around the hallways, we modeled our hallways on that. If you look at the hotel doors in that film, ours are a carbon copy. There’s a sequence in a Hitchcock movie called Torn Curtain where he comes out of his hotel and he gets on the bus and he goes to the museum; we have a bit of an homage to that sequence when Deputy Kovacs goes from his office to the art museum and he’s being chased by Willem Dafoe’s character.

Elokuvan lehdistökirjasessa horistaan niitä näitä (pdf):

Ralph Fiennes: Speed of delivery is something he really values because this kind of material needs that kind of liveliness.

Telegraphissa kerrotaan elokuvan kirjallisesta inspiraatiosta:

There were so many descriptions of parts of life, which — as much as we may have read or seen something of them in movies — we didn’t really know about from his time, before reading Zweig’s memoir. In particular I don’t think I ever thought about the moment when it became necessary to have a passport, which is hugely meaningful when you see it through his eyes. You suddenly see this control that comes in.

Elvis Mitchellin haastattelussa Wes Anderson puhuu… noh, kaikesta, mutta myös elokuvasta.

Elokuvallisia huomioita maailmalta 15.03.2014 – 22.03.2014

  • Post-Empire Strikes Back – DISCUSSED: Sodomania, A Bug’s Life, A Fictional Work of Fiction, Super-Subtle Intertextuality, Twitter, Picking Fights with Dead Guys, Fifty Shades of Grey, Movies Made by Committee, Ellisian Perversion, The Unsung Swordsman of the Year, Listless Southern California Girls, Striking a Pose and Holding It So the Terror Doesn’t Show, Batwing Lashes
  • David Bordwell on formalism: ”motivation gives the audience a reason to accept a formal option” – More broadly, motivation gives the audience a reason to accept a formal option. One of my favorite examples comes in Citizen Kane. Having decided to tell Kane’s story in flashbacks more or less chronologically, Herman Mankiewicz and Orson Welles confronted a problem in their frame story. After Kane’s death a reporter would naturally turn to his surviving second wife before contacting friends or associates. But if Susan recounted her memories of Kane before the other witnesses did, her episodes would come from late in his life and throw off the chronology. Therefore the script makes Susan too drunk and angry to talk to the reporter Thompson when he calls. He must proceed to the Thatcher library, where he’ll learn about Kane’s earliest years. Later, when Susan is more sober, she recounts her flashback in its proper, chronological place.
  • Bill Murray’s reddit AMA in a slightly more readable format

Elokuvallisia huomioita maailmalta 12.03.2014 – 15.03.2014

  • The cinema of Paul Verhoeven has an incredible amount of stupidity, but it is never stupidity that isn’t in some way attached to smartness – Everyone is a critic, but more than that, everyone, I think, has a critic inside them–a person whose opinions they’ve unconsciously adopted as their own, someone who they agree with so deeply that they act as their representative in normal life. Not in a plagiarist sense, necessarily. More like a hero or an idol that they emulate in their opinions, consciously or unconsciously, that they use to strengthen their resolve in their opinions. They exist in every field, from politics to music to books: The people we refer to in our Twitter wars and masters’ theses and dinnertime fights.
  • Fewer Sitcom Hits Could Mean More Smart Sitcoms – “These new shows aren’t just competing with each other,” one top TV agent says. “It’s now just as easy to click a button and watch an old episode of something else, or a new movie, as it is to watch a [network] series.” Older shows have a leg up: They’ve already gotten viewers hooked. Says the agent, “It’s such a wider canvas now, that if you don’t get those eyeballs immediately, there’s a chance you’ll never get them.”
  • The drawings illustrate the moment before the ”cigarette burn”
  • Sampo-elokuvan 4K-restaurointi – SampoSampo / Sampo / The Day the Earth Froze (US) Neuvostoliitto/Suomi 1959. Tuotantoyhtiö: Mosfilm, Suomi Filmi. Tuottaja: G. Kuznetsov, Risto Orko. Ohjaus: Aleksandr Phtusko. Käsikirjoitus: Viktor Vitkovitsh, Grigori Jagdfelde – Kalevalan Sampo-runot (1835). Asiantuntijat: Väinö Kauko-nen, Kustaa

Joulukuussako elokuviako?

142 elokuvaa koko vuonna? Apua.